{"id":11062,"date":"2024-01-19T10:18:45","date_gmt":"2024-01-19T09:18:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.der-digitalisierungsberater.de\/hooray-we-are-getting-an-opinion-dictatorship-fully-digital\/"},"modified":"2026-05-04T11:31:57","modified_gmt":"2026-05-04T09:31:57","slug":"hooray-we-are-getting-an-opinion-dictatorship-fully-digital","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.der-digitalisierungsberater.de\/en\/hooray-we-are-getting-an-opinion-dictatorship-fully-digital\/","title":{"rendered":"Hooray, we are getting an opinion dictatorship\u2014fully digital."},"content":{"rendered":"

Digital censorship\u2014and everyone is joining in (almost everyone), but do not celebrate too soon!
\nBecause it is NOT for our protection!<\/b><\/p>\n

In IT, the term “single point of truth”<\/strong><\/em> is well known. It refers to accessing data for analyses and evaluations from one source, not from 20 different ones. After all, anyone who wants to make decisions needs reliable data from reliable sources\u2014ideally from a single one. <\/p>\n

In IT, that makes sense, because a company can decide for itself what the “truth”<\/strong><\/em> is that is reflected in its own data.
\nBut is politics allowed to do that? Is the state allowed to do that? Is there really only ONE truth<\/strong> in life? What is truth anyway, and how can we recognize it\u2014or even assess it? <\/p>\n

Questions upon questions that we should be asking ourselves\u2014and that WE should also have answers to.<\/p>\n

Is it right that politicians, the state, the WHO, the UN, UNESCO, or the World Economic Forum<\/strong>, together with all those whose own interests are behind it, define and spread the “truth assigned to us”<\/strong><\/em>\u2014or should we not be able to weigh one piece of information against another and recognize for ourselves which truth is the truth for us?<\/p>\n

In this video, Ms. von der Leyen calls for a fight against misinformation and disinformation. For many, that may sound plausible, but not to me. Because I still have my own brain, my own heart, and my gut feeling to assess things, statements, or hypotheses myself. <\/p>\n

Anyone who wants to train people to become willing recipients of centrally controlled truth (which has been happening for a long time) is creating an opinion dictatorship\u2014something that is really only necessary if a general dictatorship is also being pursued.<\/p>\n

Wait a second\u2014has he lost it again, some will ask? Call it whatever you want, but do not misunderstand the real purpose behind Uschi\u2019s initiative. This lady does not mean well by us; she means well by the compliant characters sitting on and in front of that stage. <\/p>\n

Because these individuals aspire to decide everything that affects us and our lives\u2014and I do not agree with that at all.<\/p>\n

Anyone who looks closely has to realize that misinformation and disinformation<\/strong> are coming from that very stage.
\nSo what could be more obvious than to label all other information as false, dangerous, and divisive?
\nThis is where the rich and powerful sit, with only one goal: more money and more power\u2014and that has worked brilliantly in recent years. <\/p>\n

You should not point at dressed people with bare fingers. That can backfire. And Uschi and her associates are afraid of losing control. Digital censorship\u2014especially digital and media censorship\u2014<\/strong>is a proven tool for that, which I would like to examine in this blog post from the aspects mentioned. More in the article.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>

<\/div>